Publishers have a problem: Their paywalls are too steep to scale


If 2018 showed us anything, it’s that the Duopoly seems to be unstoppable. Google and Facebook lurched from scandal to scandal, suffering bad press, but sacrificing just a fraction of their market shares. Why? Put simply, they still have more of the granular, behavioral and interest data that advertisers want.

To bolster themselves against this unshakable reality, publishers are doubling down on subscriptions. In fact, 52 percent said building logged-in audiences will be their top business priority in 2019, according to Reuters Institute. Bloomberg, Vanity Fair, Business Insider and others are already working on it, gathering both recurring revenue and the deterministic IDs that capture accurate first-party data.

But the strategy is about to hit a wall. Specifically, a hard (or metered) paywall. Publishers often deploy static paywalls — the kind that drops uniformly for every reader — as a first step toward building a subscriber base. These initially pay dividends by accruing a base of frequent readers and super fans. But publishers soon find that it is trickier to lure occasional and flyby readers with the same approach.

Enter dynamic paywalls.

Last year, the New York Times, New York Media, and the Wall Street Journal launched new, data-driven paywalls that court subscribers in a more personalized way. Where static paywalls are essentially one-size fits all, the machine learning behind dynamic paywalls crunches user data before determining how to meter site content and offer discounts in return for memberships.

Variables might include demographic information like geography and salary range, as well as on-site behavior like how many stories they read in a session, what kinds of stories they read and more. The Wall Street Journal, which hit its 3 million subscriber mark last year, did just this: bucketing readers into three groups and serving offers based on their likelihood to subscribe.

Publishers don’t need to have the Journal’s resources or scale to accomplish their subscription goals. Danish publisher Nordjyske Medier increased its subscribers by 50 percent when it used a dynamic paywall to tailor and test subscription messages. Through this method, they soon found that die-hard soccer fans were more likely to subscribe when encouraged to keep up with their team’s every play.

The Journal’s approach is simple and effective, but dynamic paywalls offer myriad possibilities. Publishers can balance ad campaign fulfillment with subscription revenue by gating content based on interest. Those die-hard soccer fans might not have access to the sports section without a subscription, but have free reign of the other sections where they contribute valuable impressions. Further, when a big story breaks, editors who want to make sure it gets the widest reach (and ad execs hungry to meet impressions quotas) can request the paywall be dropped.

Most importantly, publishers can use modelling to predict which customers are likely to churn, and when. The Times and Sunday Times of London found that 96 percent of the readers who entered the subscription process were dropping off. Using propensity modeling (a statistical scorecard used to gauge the likelihood of a consumer’s behavior), they began segmenting readers and personalizing their message. The changes boosted conversion by 190 percentaccording to recently released figures. The same can be done with users who are at risk of cancelling their subscriptions.

Personalized experiences 

But dynamic paywalls aren’t just about the bottom line. User experience is buoyed when publisher sites respond to an individual’s distinct preferences. After years of social feed algorithms catering to their every whim, readers expectation for personalized content is higher than ever. Those raised expectations open up an opportunity for publishers.

For most of the industry’s history, publishing has been a top-down, mass media experience. Reporters and editors dictated the shape of the world based on their own priorities, and in large part they still do. But the one-to-many dynamic that worked when people were accustomed to being spoken to no longer does. Now, readers no longer want to be just another set of eyes. They want to be a valued customer.

Personalized experiences allow for this. Much like subscription services that curate selections based on a customer’s stated preferences, content personalization can design home pages, app screens, newsletters and advertising messages that speak to an individual’s needs. Publishers that opt-in to personalization move from courting readers to courting customers and, eventually, establishing consumption habits like daily newsletter reading. With tactics like this, publishers have the opportunity to become more relevant than ever.

This service-oriented mindset is just what is needed to steal attention (and advertising money) from the almighty platforms, where algorithms pick the content and “users” aren’t just one of thousands: they’re one of billions. At the end of the day, the Duopoly may be able to reap data from an increasingly skeptical audience, but overcoming the brand relationship between a trusted media outlet committed to personalization and its subscribed readers may be too steep a wall for them to climb.

Source: Cxense

Read also:

How Google’s decision to kill 3rd-party cookies will affect to the digital marketing ecosystem?


Google has announced its decision to block third-party cookies from Chrome in two years. In practice, this will mean a big change in user data collection and advertising targeting, as Chrome controls nearly 70% of the desktop browser market. After Google’s announcement speculation started immediately – how it will affect programmatic buying of advertising and third-party data audiences, which mainly are based on cookies currently.

Read more

Digital Marketing 2020 – What are the current trends?


Typically, early in the year, it is anticipated which topics will become the hottest in digital marketing this year. What has already changed the digital world and what is getting around the corner? What are the questions marketers are currently looking for answers to? Here are some themes that will challenge and inspire digital business and marketing professionals in 2020.

Read more

What are 1st, 2nd and 3rd party data and how can they be used in marketing?


Data is one of the key drivers of successful marketing. One of the biggest challenges for the marketer is crystallizing the data, prioritizing it and making it usable. What kind of data you are most useful as a marketer depends on your current situation and your goals.

Read more

What is TCF 2.0 about and what do you have to do?


TCF, or Transparency & Consent Framework, is an industry-standard that allows to obtain the required permission for the use of data from consumers and to pass this permission (or prohibition) in an intelligible form to the digital advertising industry. There is a need for a common standard as there is a large number of data-driven players in the market.

Read more joins Relevant Audience, which will become Finland’s largest independent data marketplace

2019/11/21 is joining Relevant Audience, Finland’s largest independent data marketplace. It currently includes 18 million unique browsers, as well as 500 million monthly data collection events.

Read more