Relevant Viewpoint: Creative predictions for 2017

2017/03/08

Relevant Viewpoint investigates pain points, success stories and trends in the industry and in this interview we discuss the progress made by publishers in 2016 and what to expect in 2017 with Gustaf Jilken, Director Nordics, Integral Ad Science (IAS).

The media trends are changing and we see a tendency towards more transparency and control on both sides of the fence – whether you’re a publisher or an advertiser, you want to be certain on what you are trading. How does IAS see this coming into effect?

At the close of 2016, publishers found themselves faced with a somewhat confusing landscape. Whilst agencies and advertisers have been looking to define and implement some of their own viewability standards, publishers have in turn been trying to develop bespoke trading mechanisms. Some of these demands and metrics can include:

– 100% ‘in-view’ requirements
– Time-based selling (e.g. Cost Per Hour)
– Custom viewability thresholds (e.g. 70% in view, 10 seconds minimum etc)
– Only paying for viewable impressions

Alongside trying to improve their own viewability results and dealing with increasing agency demands, publishers have also had to contend with the recent increase of readers installing ad blockers. Ad blocking has raised concerns around the quality of ads and highlighted the importance of a good user experience. In order to reduce ad blocker usage, publishers should always keep the user front of mind whilst working to improve viewability, and ensure they deliver only high quality, relevant ads.

With both publishers and agencies somewhat veering away from the industry standard definition for viewability, some publishers don’t know where to turn. Many, of course, are staying put, and are trying to second-guess where the industry is heading. What does seem to be clear however, is that we are moving towards trading on viewability, e.g.paying only for viewable impressions. Publishers who are prepared for this will fair well.

So with the combination of ad blocking and a proliferation of viewability trading models, overall 2016 was a challenging year for publishers. But what has 2017 got in store?

Brand safety and ad fraud will continue to rise in prominence for advertisers, but 2017 will also see the industry move beyond viewability. Advertisers and publishers alike will consider both viewability as well as additional metrics when assessing a campaign’s success, such as:

– The quality of ad placements
– The quality of the audience
– Average / total time in view
– Time and exposure at a user level
– Ad clutter

IAS already did integrated with major ad servers like Smart Adserver in order to give publishers more control in handling viewability metrics and offer their advertisers more premium products. So we see an interest from both the demand and supply side to deliver better controls, results and metrics.

To date the ad blocking debate has focused, somewhat unfairly, on the publisher side of the industry. How do you see the publisher turning this topic around and do you think the publisher can make the change and take advantage of the situation?

2017 will see increasing pressure on advertisers and their creative agencies to deliver more relevant ad formats, as well as lighter ad units. Heavy and slow-loading creative assets have a negative impact on user experience and have an impact on levels of ad blocking. For the most part this has been largely ignored, with most coverage around ‘poor publishers with large numbers of badly placed obstructive ad formats’. What about the premium publishers with a single ad format, or just two ad slots per page, who are handed a slow-loading creative which negatively impacts both viewability and user experience? We need to see more pressure from advertisers and agencies on creative agencies to deliver more manageable creative formats.

Whilst ad blocking, agency demands and media quality are all here to stay for 2017, a big focus for publishers will be time-based, or CPH (Cost Per hour) ad campaigns. The Economist was the trailblazer here, with the Guardian and the Financial Times following suit with similar offerings. And we recently saw JP/Politikens Hus in Denmark introduce time based advertising. Research undertaken by IAS and IPG found that the ideal time for a user to be exposed to an ad is nine times, for over 10 seconds. We will most likely see an increase in the number of publishers offering time based solutions in 2017, especially if it can be proved to increase advertising effectiveness. The next step is how these campaigns can be delivered both programmatically and in an automated manner.

Finally, the industry will continue to focus on trust and transparency, with increasing relevance of industry bodies like the MRC and ABC. Publishers who embrace this and ensure they work with trusted vendors are a step ahead.

2016 has been a challenging year for publishers with the persistence and growth of ad blocking, a variety of agency viewability demands, and publishers looking at their own models. 2017 will see similar trends as the market slowly moves towards fully trading on viewability.

Premium publishers however should have absolute confidence in the quality journalism they produce, particularly with the rise of fake news sites, and should embrace media quality as a way of standing out from the crowd.

Read also:

Data traders’ drop out game has started?

2019/03/27

Last week, it was reported that Oracle has stopped selling AddThis data in Europe. Data traders who collect their data in contravention of the GDPR can still be found in bulk and we believe that the removal of AddThis is just a prelude. We will see significant market cleaning done during this and next year and the first signs of this are already visible in the Nordic countries.

Read more

How to improve the visibility of ad placements?

2019/02/27

Placement visibility plays a significant role in business on commercial sites. Ad visibility has for long been a hot topic among publishers, advertisers, and agencies. The visibility of the placements, or viewability, is measured by in-screen values. Paying attention to the visibility of placements can significantly affect your earnings. Bad in-screen values tell the publisher that at least these things need more attention.

Read more

Advanced programmatic reporting across multiple SSPs and Adservers

2019/02/27

Using multiple sales systems is a part of the everyday life for almost all media, especially in programmatic sales of advertising. Increasing the number of technology partners is necessary to achieve sales growth, but at the same time sales tracking and reporting gets more complicated. We solved the challenge by developing a tool that enables multiple SSPs and Adservers’ monitoring and reporting in one interface.

Read more

Relevant is more than ad-tech

2019/02/19

Relevant Digital Oy is well-known for setting up tools and technologies required for online advertising and for developing and commercialising online media. Ad servers, software vending and marketing technologies and the related know-how are an important part of our offering, but it does not stop there. In addition to tech projects, we regularly carry out demanding consultancy projects.

Read more

Where to pay attention to when you want to increase programmatic sales of advertising?

2019/01/24

Typically, programmatic sales means selling and buying online advertising, often using fully automated systems, thereby deviating from traditional sales processes that involve negotiating between people and handling orders. Programming advertising has been quickly adopted in different markets, making it easier, faster and more flexible to buy media inventory.

Read more